Papers
arxiv:2611.07940

CardioLM: A multilingual suite of small language models for the cardiology domain

Published on Nov 5
Authors:
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,

Abstract

A cardiology-specific multilingual corpus and named entity recognition models demonstrate that multilingual joint training outperforms specialty-specific pretraining for clinical entity extraction across languages.

Background: Cardiovascular care generates large volumes of clinical free-text documentation in local languages. However, clinical natural language processing (NLP) resources remain concentrated in English, and no existing benchmark is cardiology-specific, multilingual, and broad in entity coverage. Methods: We present two contributions. The first is CardioCCC, a corpus of 508 cardiology case reports originally published in Spanish and extended to Czech, Dutch, English, Italian, Romanian, and Swedish through machine translation, annotation projection, and clinician review, with annotations covering diseases, symptoms, procedures, and medications. The second is CardioLM, comprising CardioBERTa, a set of language-specific encoders obtained by continued pretraining on cardiology and biomedical corpora, and CardioNER, a set of named entity recognition (NER) models fine-tuned on CardioCCC. Results: Cardiology-specific pretraining reduced pseudo-perplexity by up to a factor of eight, yet changed strict span-level F1 by at most 0.04, with benefits concentrated in languages whose backbones lacked biomedical coverage. The jointly trained multilingual XLM-RoBERTa-large models achieved the best strict F1 in nearly every language and entity type, exceeding the strongest monolingual system by up to 0.13 F1. A large share of residual errors concerned boundary detection: relaxed matching recovered 0.10-0.23 F1 for disease, procedure, and symptom, but only 0.01-0.07 for medication. Clinicians rated CardioNER well above a rule- and dictionary-based baseline, with the mean rating across entity types rising from 26% to 73%. Conclusions: Specialty-specific pretraining is not the decisive factor for downstream entity recognition, whereas multilingual joint training yields the strongest results in nearly all settings and a simpler deployment path for multi-country clinical information extraction.

Community

Sign up or log in to comment

Get this paper in your agent:

hf papers read 2611.07940
Don't have the latest CLI?
curl -LsSf https://hf.co/cli/install.sh | bash

Models citing this paper 0

No model linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2611.07940 in a model README.md to link it from this page.

Datasets citing this paper 0

No dataset linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2611.07940 in a dataset README.md to link it from this page.

Spaces citing this paper 0

No Space linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2611.07940 in a Space README.md to link it from this page.

Collections including this paper 0

No Collection including this paper

Add this paper to a collection to link it from this page.